Network Streamers

Pros

Sound. Interior exploration with USB drive, Cromecast

Cons

Codec Bluetooth SBC-Low-Complexity Sub-Band Codec

Review

Here they asked a question about Sbersvuk and Yandex Music. Both work through Cromecast. For configuration, you need to install the Google Home program, add Primar NP5 to the Cromecast list of accessible accessories on the home network, then the broadcast will be available in SberZvuk and Yandex Music. The rest of the information is enough on the network, everything is relevant. Separate respect Polt.ru. Great service, special thanks to manager Nicholas in the cabin of Krasnodar.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Compactness.

Cons

Sensory buttons are highlighted only when pressed.

Review

The compact modern device of the initial Hi-Fi level, gives out a good sound, I am not a music lover with a sophisticated hearing, but it suits me. The Wi-Fi signal holds well, two ranges. I listen to the Internet radio through the HEOS application, Apple Music via AirPlay. I don’t listen to the wheels, but maybe I'll start once.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Sound, convenience, functionality, appearance

Cons

Could not find

Review

In terms of functionality, the CXN exceeds everyone in its price category and many with a price of 1.5–2 times higher. He keeps the WIFI connection well, but I connected it with a cable. The management is very simple, in the applications you can see CXN V2 as an external device. An excellent thing Chromecast is supported in Yandex-music services and ZVUK (Sberbianculations). At the ZVUK service from a premium subscription (199 rubles per month), tracks in CD quality are available. But the music on Tidal Hifi sounds better. Before buying at Pult.ru, I compared with Primar Prisma and Hegel H95. The sound of Cambridge seemed to me more lively than Primare, more neutral and airy than Hegel. Of course, Primare and Hegel have their advantages, but in general, by sound these are devices of the same class. Cambridge sound is closer to me. The sound of Cambridge CXN V2 is English - soft, but with good dynamics, neutral tonal balance, the sound is very detailed, with a good scene, a lot of air. The CXN works well as an external DAC. According to the genres, everything plays equally well. Jazz and classic sound magical. But the CXN recording disadvantages will show you clearly. My opinion Cambridge CXN V2 is an outstanding device, the best in its price category and may well compete with more expensive devices Many thanks to the consultants Pult.ru for listening and organizing the purchase.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Excellent sound

Cons

Does not display the integrated album cover coverage in DSD (.dsf) files

Review

This device has a very high -quality sound. If someone is looking for a device for high-quality reproduction of digital material, you should pay attention to this device, and be sure to listen to it. The functionality is similar to the NAIM Devices of the Uniti line. He works in tandem with the Naim Super Nait 3 integrated amplifier (connected by a standard 5-Pin Naim interblock cable). As a source of musical material, USB-disks and Naim Uniti Core are used. It is controlled through the standard NAIM application.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Acceptable sound, connection capabilities

Cons

Regularly loses Wi-Fi, there is no Deezer service, dull backlighting the selection of a menu item on the screen

Review

A good, but definitely not outstanding sound. He regularly loses the Wi-Fi network and, accordingly, interrupts the sound both on the Internet radio and on music services (about 2-3 minutes of the break every 20-40 minutes). At the same time, there are no problems from the phone in the same network at all. This is the second device, the first did not join the network at all, I had to make an exchange. I probably would have handed it back and this instance, but it is not clear what to change.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews