Cambridge CXN V2 Network Player

Pros

Great sound. User-friendly application.

Cons

No

Review

Possibility of different connections to amplifiers, including power amplifier. Convenient application for control over the network. Tidal works, Quality DAC. Ability to connect to a PC via usb. Reads flash drives, disks, DLNA.

Pros

Sound, convenience, functionality, appearance

Cons

Could not find

Review

In terms of functionality, the CXN exceeds everyone in its price category and many with a price of 1.5–2 times higher. He keeps the WIFI connection well, but I connected it with a cable. The management is very simple, in the applications you can see CXN V2 as an external device. An excellent thing Chromecast is supported in Yandex-music services and ZVUK (Sberbianculations). At the ZVUK service from a premium subscription (199 rubles per month), tracks in CD quality are available. But the music on Tidal Hifi sounds better. Before buying at Pult.ru, I compared with Primar Prisma and Hegel H95. The sound of Cambridge seemed to me more lively than Primare, more neutral and airy than Hegel. Of course, Primare and Hegel have their advantages, but in general, by sound these are devices of the same class. Cambridge sound is closer to me. The sound of Cambridge CXN V2 is English - soft, but with good dynamics, neutral tonal balance, the sound is very detailed, with a good scene, a lot of air. The CXN works well as an external DAC. According to the genres, everything plays equally well. Jazz and classic sound magical. But the CXN recording disadvantages will show you clearly. My opinion Cambridge CXN V2 is an outstanding device, the best in its price category and may well compete with more expensive devices Many thanks to the consultants Pult.ru for listening and organizing the purchase.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Acceptable sound, connection capabilities

Cons

Regularly loses Wi-Fi, there is no Deezer service, dull backlighting the selection of a menu item on the screen

Review

A good, but definitely not outstanding sound. He regularly loses the Wi-Fi network and, accordingly, interrupts the sound both on the Internet radio and on music services (about 2-3 minutes of the break every 20-40 minutes). At the same time, there are no problems from the phone in the same network at all. This is the second device, the first did not join the network at all, I had to make an exchange. I probably would have handed it back and this instance, but it is not clear what to change.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Sound, function, application, balance

Cons

Does not support Deezer (at least for now)

Review

Acquired for a ligament with Rotel 1572MKII and Bowers Wilkins 705 Signature Connected at a balance exit. Streamer added details and focus scene (in comparison, say with the SD streamer Maratz 8006) The sound is good, and the scene and the air, while you can’t hear sharpness The application is generally cool, it happens that sometimes it can lay something (but on average the market is good). It is unequivocally worthy to be listened even in comparison with apparatus more expensive

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Functional, convenience

Cons

No

Review

I purchased the deed with delivery. They got it quickly, but when receiving it was discovered, something blurted inside. I made it to the manager, they quickly decided. I sent it back, replaced with a new one and sent it. The apparatus is very happy. I will all this store!

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Convenience and understandability

Cons

DAC?

Review

Up to 100 tr Probably there is no alternative. I myself sin by some selectivity to the Tsap microcircuits (I prefer Asahi Kasei and I do not complain about the ECS), as for Wolphson 8740 this is the real ancient shit of the mammoth! I had a SA-650 on it and even then it was not a novelty. I generally liked that Sidyuk Cambridge. He did not have digital synthetics, did not whisper, did not burn the gyrus and sounded closer to the analogue, approximately like the MM head Ortofon Red. In terms of the detail of the stars from the sky, I didn’t have enough, in the dynamics, too, but played together, whole, painted a good spatial picture ... i.e. I expected something similar by analogy. But in fact I heard completely different! I do not know what the company's engineers smoke there and what the cheap DACs Wolfson are fumigating, but to make them sound tantamount to a feat! Details and presentation at the top as that of AK4497, dynamics and rhythm as ESS9018 and all the buns from maintaining the ingenious and comfort of the old one 8740. I have long heard in CD Cyrus on Cyrus-Logic chips, but the price tag was then even on the times of the 2000s Not at all sour, around 3,000 pounds. In general, the test! Who needs a decent network streamer can no longer search. PS In the SA-81 amplification, the DAC is seriously inferior in sound, so that for the Cambridge monobrand rack: the transport of SD to this network player, the player is already in the amp.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Omnivorous formats, beautiful and strict design

Cons

Price

Review

It is very convenient to control this streamer using the Streammagic company application from the phone and therefore you can remove the remote control into a distant box, forgetting about it. Conducted a large number of switching connectors and the ability to use as a DAC.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

good sound, easy to use, consultation

Cons

No

Review

Many thanks to the store consultant, which helped to decide on the model. This is my first network to play, which I bought. And it was not for nothing that Cambridge Audio CXN V2 Lunar Grey stopped. The quality is noticeable and from the first seconds of the sound and in general in handling equipment. It is not difficult to connect, it is very simple in management. The cost of the purchase is very pleased, as well as the work of the store employees.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

In short, the delivery is fast.

Cons

No

Review

In general, for the first time I ordered through the online store, because I did not find the necessary goods in the shop, I needed a network player of Cambridge Audio CXN V2, in the first store, where the cost was the smallest, and there was no time for a couple of weeks, I ordered here in the end here . Thank you, I took it to the next day. In short, the delivery is fast.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Good sound and inexpensive

Cons

There are no

Review

I bought a player here and decided to write a review right away. The store has very good staff, the manager did not count with his time, helped me choose the right model, explained and consulted about functionality. Together with him, we checked the sound in a room specially designated for listening. I was satisfied with the purchase, the service is doubly

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

Store workers.

Cons

Minor with delivery.

Review

I purchased a network player of Cambridge Audio CXNV2, and I was completely satisfied with the goods and interaction with the store employees. My purchase was delivered to the May holidays, for which thanks, I would like to receive goods per day, not for three, and otherwise everything is wonderful . Sum player is excellent. I recommend this store.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews

Pros

good functionality, excellent sound

Cons

There is no support for detezer

Review

I chose among several, I want to note the professionalism of the manager, I helped you understand the advantages and disadvantages of each model. The Cambridge Audio CXN V2 decided to purchase the network player due to the following advantages - an excellent sound, the ability to connect to amplifiers. There is also a network management application. Personally, I only lack Deeezer support.

Translated from pult.ru
Original reviews